• el_bhm@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          All of this justifies Russia attacking a sovereign country, alright. With most of the equipment and uniforms bearing Z, the modern swastika. In mission to provide living room and freedom to true russian people. By committing genocide.

          Also, land mines. Ukraine accused of using land mines. Projections give us 700 years to remove mines in Ukraine. 700. Years. Placed by a country that did not sign the Ottawa Treaty.

          Now. Tell me about them projections. Cannot wait.

          Then call me names.

          And then a troll.

          Or do we do whataboutism again (see the links comment, adding for clarity) and then change subjects?

          Which part of the script are we rehearsing?

            • el_bhm@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What is Russia business in Ukraine’s overthrowing their government?

              How is talking Israel not changing subjects?

            • Skua@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I see this Stoltenberg quote confidently thrown out so often in defence of Russia’s invasion. Do you think Russia has some kind of actual right to invade countries if NATO doesn’t do what it says? Would you be defending Germany if it sent a similar letter to the CSTO and then invaded Serbia?

              • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Of course it does. It’s a superpower with a right to protect its citizens from the threats of the world’s most aggressive military alliance, making threats to install nukes etc. Do you think the US would behave differently?

                • Skua@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Hot take but if the USA invaded Mexico because the CSTO refused to stop accepting members then I would, in fact, think that that was bad actually

                  • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    But that’s not a singular scenario. If you want an analogy it would be Russia or China installing nukes on the US-Mexico border and constantly talking shit.